Christianity 101 - Purposeful misconceptions debunked




There are uncountable issues with the ways Christianity and Jesus Christ are portrayed, wether its by the media or the churches themselves. Much like in the middle ages people rely solely on Pastors and Priests to get understanding of Gods will, the only difference being that today the people could easily read the scripture themselves, yet do not. As such I feel the need to present some doctrines, some angles of view as well as explaining some stories found in the Bible to increase some understanding of Gods will.

Now there are so many issues one needs to adress that Im not sure where to start really, so let us just dive in.

One of the biggest banes we have to endure is probably people revering those that call themselves "jews" today. A lot of people believe they are the "original chosen" and as such should be looked up to. However this assertion falls apart because of 2 simple reasons: They rejected Jesus, and as such God. They murdered God because they didnt agree with his will and the truth he brought, and neither did they want to follow his teachings. They murdered him, the truth and the word/will of God, even though he never harmed anyone and merely talked to those willing to listen to him. This is the mentality of those calling themselves jews today, murdering the truth because they dont like the truth.

The second issue would be that they arent even descendent of Judah or even Israel/Jacob as they claim.
They are the Edomites that lived in judeah

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edom
>The Edomites first established a kingdom ("Edom") in the southern area
of modern Jordan and later migrated into southern parts of the Kingdom of Judah ("Idumea", or modern southern Israel/Negev)
Eventually they were forced to convert
>They were again subdued by John Hyrcanus (c. 125 BC), who forcibly converted them, among others, to Judaism

And around that same time the Pharisee that follow the oral law come around
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pharisees
>The Pharisees preserved the Pharisaical oral law in the form of the Talmud
like we have today the kikes follow the Tal Mud and which was repeatedly rebuked by Jesus, telling them they are children of Satan.

Now Edomites are the descendents of Essau, the brother of Jacob/Israel who decided to wage war his brother and his people.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edom
>The Hebrew word Edom means "red", and is derived from the name of its founder Esau

Now to do this Essau joined Amalek
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amalek
>According to the Bible, Amalek was the son of Eliphaz (himself the son of Esau, ancestor of the Edomites)
 Now to assert this claim there are 2 points to substantiate. The first would be that those Pharisee are the modern Jews and that the Pharisee are actually the Edomites.
The connection of the Pharisee to the modern Jews is rather obvious, as they follower the Oral Law which became the Talmud couple centuries later, full of ways to argue how to not break any laws without following it. So at least spiritually they are the same.

Now what links the Pharisee to the Edomites? Flavius Josephus said
http://www.documentacatholicaomnia.eu/03d/0037-0103,_Flavius_Josephus,_De_Bello_Judaico,_EN.pdf
>2. For there are three philosophical sects among the Jews. The followers of the first of which are the Pharisees; of the second, the Sadducees; and the third sect, which pretends to a severer discipline, are called Essens. These last are Jews by birth, and seem to have a greater affection for one another than the other sects have.
 So the Pharisee were not among the natives of Judeah, thus were one of the other ethnic groups. Furthermore the King at the Time of Jesus was an Edomite
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herod_the_Great
Herod's father was by descent an Edomite, whose ancestors had converted to Judaism.
This is the Herod 2 generation before Jesus birth, but they all share the same lineage. Suddenly it gives reason to why Herod wanted to kill Jesus at his birth when he heard the Magi search for the King of Judeans (Ioudaios, likely refering to all inhabitants of the Kingdom of Judeah), because he feared the rightful heir of the throne to take over as he didnt have a real claim to the throne.
This also gives reason to what Jesus crime was declared to on the cross, INRI
>Iesus Nazarenus, Rex Iudaeorum
>Jesus the Nazarene, King of the Judeans
His crime, as by Pilates, was that he was the king of Judeah, thus threatened Herods throne and with it the stronghold the Pharisee had over the (Herods) Temple. Now since Herod was an Edomite and the Pharisee had a stronghold over his Temple and general influence, it links them right back to being Edomites themselves.

It is to note here that Pilates stood up for Jesus, the representative of Rome wanted Jesus to be free.
20But the chief priests and elders persuaded the crowds to ask for Barabbas and to have Jesus put to death.
21“Which of the two do you want me to release to you?” asked the governor.
“Barabbas,” they replied.
22“What then should I do with Jesus who is called Christ?” Pilate asked.
They all answered, “Crucify Him!”
23“Why?” asked Pilate. “What evil has He done?”
But they shouted all the louder, “Crucify Him!”
 24When Pilate saw that he was accomplishing nothing, but that instead a riot was breaking out, he took water and washed his hands before the crowd. “I am innocent of this man’s blood,c ” he said. “You bear the responsibility.”
25All the people answered, “His blood be on us and on our children!”
26So Pilate released Barabbas to them. But he had Jesus flogged, and handed Him over to be crucified.
 Even Herods son who took over at the time of his crucifixion declared Jesus innocent
13Then Pilate called together the chief priests, the rulers, and the people, 14and said to them, “You brought me this man as one who was inciting the people to rebellion. I have examined Him here in your presence and found Him not guilty of your charges against Him. 15Neither has Herod, for he sent Him back to us. As you can see, He has done nothing deserving of death. 16Therefore I will punish Him and release Him.”a
 So why was Jesus still exectuted? Because the Pharisee riled up the people. Judeah just calmed down from a civil unrest and brought under the control of Rome. As such Pilates feared he can lose control over the area which he would have a real hard time to explain to Cesar. Furthermore, since people called Jesus king it gave grounds to claim that Pilates would back up another king, not approved by Rome and thus would revolt against Rome itself. As there was no time left to check back and ask how to handle this he seemingly decided its better to have Jesus die even though being innocent than lose the entire area and possibly his own head.


The Pharisee feared to lose their influence as Jesus was exposing their hypocracy and evil. They feared him taking the throne and thus they wouldnt have been supported by Herod anymore which through association is a good hint that the Pharisee were Edomites much like Herod.

Now when we look at the lineage of the Edomite it gets clear that God isnt very fond of them as they descent from the Amalek
The Amalek themselves are Canaanites, which too were commanded to be genocided because of their evil.
Now traditionally its said that Canaan continues the line of Cain through mixing with the Kennites, or that Hams (Canaans father) wife was a Cainite.
Cain himself is heavily implied to be a descendent of Eve and the Serpent/Satan

And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel.
The serpent, Satan, here is said to have produced offspring with Eve. Now Eve got Cain and Abel (and Seth, which we dont go into here).
http://theopenscroll.com/cainsPaternity.htm
This goes into a lot of further hints into that theory .The aramaic targum states that Eve desired the angel.
https://www.sefaria.org/Targum_Jonathan_on_Genesis.4?lang=bi
And Adam knew Hava his wife, who had desired the Angel; and she conceived, and bare Kain; and she said, I have acquired a man, the Angel of the Lord.
There are also the various references hinting at sex. They were naked and covered themselves up afterwards. The woman is cursed togive birth in great pain, God brings up the seed of them both and trees in general are a symbol for lineage and Cain and Abel being born shortly afterwards.

 Also
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seraph

A seraph (/ˈsɛrəf/, "the burning one"/"serpent"; or seraphim /ˈsɛrəfJm/, in the King James Version also seraphims (plural); Hebrew: שָׂרָף śārāf, plural שְׂרָפִים śərāfîm; Latin: seraphim and seraphin (plural), also seraphus (-i, m.);[1] Greek: σεραφείμ serapheím Arabic: مشرفين Musharifin[2]) is a type of celestial or heavenly being originating in Ancient Judaism.
A serpent as a class of angels, that is the angel she conceived Cain from, the serpent, not as many try to say that it was just a random speaking serpent in Eden. There is a case to be made that Cain is spiritually of the serpent instead of being a direct child, but for the sake of the narrative it doesnt change much.
Now considering this when Jesus calls the Pharisee a "Brood of Viper" (Matthew 23:33) or says that they are of their father the Devil (John 8:44) this may was meant to be way more literal than usually cared to believe.


So for these 2 reasons already we should be sceptic of their proposals and requests. The war in the middle east being led relentless against those that threaten Israel who have our unwavering support simply because of their claim of being the chosen ones is a great example we thoroughly need to rethink.

Similary their claim of following the original faith of Abraham and that Christianity is an off shoot of this faith is wrong and actually the other way around.
Back in the day there was no Judaism, just the faith of Abraham and later the Israelites. At the time Jesus came there were 3 main sects, The Essenes (The only ones native to Judeah), the Sadduccess and the Pharisee (both being not native to Judeah).
The Pharisee are the Edomites which previously were forced to convert. However they really liked their old customs which were unlawful and thus they created the Oral Law. You know how in Court a lawyer will use semantics, grey areas, loopholes and other pilpul to argue they didnt break a law which they never followed completly ignoring the intent behind the law? The Oral Law of the Pharisee is a guideline on how to do that with the OT Law.
This is the group of people pretty much all quarrels Jesus had was with and they were constantly rebuked for this by him, God himself, for being hypocrites, a brood of Vipers, even the children of the devil. Even their name describes them seperating themselves from the original
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pharisees
>"Pharisee" is derived from Ancient Greek Pharisaios (Φαρισαῖος),[8] from Aramaic Pərīšā (Hebrew: פְּרִישָׁא), plural Pərīšayyā (Hebrew: פְּרִישַׁיָּא), meaning "set apart, separated"
So by all means the Pharisee splitted themselves off from the original faith which became known and was continued through Christianity and thus by all practical means was Pre-Christ-Christianity.

This Oral Law of the Pharisee then after a few 100 years got written down in the (Babylonian) Talmud starting what is now known as Judaism. So its not that Christianity is based on Judaism, but that Judaism is a collection of blasphemies and herasies of Christianity.



Another thing we need to rethink is our stance on different social politics. The following are some examples of laws given to us, which we chose to ignore fairly recently, and right after we see the western civilization go through a great plight

Anti homosexuality
13If a man lies with a man as with a woman, they have both committed an abomination. They must surely be put to death; their blood is upon them.

Anti Racemixing 
3Do not intermarry with them. Do not give your daughters to their sons or take their daughters for your sons, 4because they will turn your sons away from following Me to serve other gods. Then the anger of the LORD will burn against you, and He will swiftly destroy you.
against racemixing. 
Now often its claimed this merely means to not marry someone of another believe regardless of race however 
12 "Beware, my son, of every kind of fornication. First of all, marry a woman from among the descendants of your ancestors; do not marry a foreign woman, who is not of your father's tribe; for we are the descendants of the prophets. Remember, my son, that Noah, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, our ancestors of old, all took wives from among their kindred. They were blessed in their children, and their posterity will inherit the land.
Against Mass Immigrations 
8When the Most High gave the nations their inheritance, when He divided the sons of man, He set the boundaries of the peoples according to the number of the sons of God.
Against illegal Immigration
1“Truly, truly, I tell you, whoever does not enter the sheepfold by the gate, but climbs in some other way, is a thief and a robber.
Now this one speaks about heaven primarily, but to view it only in that light would imply there is a possibility to sneak into heaven, which there is very likely non, thus need to see how else this is meant, meaning that anyone who sneaks into your land doesnt have anything good in mind or otherwise wouldnt have to sneak around

Essentially forbids gender reassignment surgery, against trannies
1No man with crushed or severed genitals may enter the assembly of the LORD.
We could also look at the tower of Babel where people got together and suddenly believed they dont need God anymore and thus got their shit wrecked heavily. And as if noone learned anything they now push for a globalists society and government while subsequently trying to destroy the faith, destroy Christianity at every step, making us live through that very story once again.

That God doesn like all this multi cultural stuff also is seen by a horde of foreigners coming into your country being proclaimed to be a punishment of God
47Because you did not serve the LORD your God with joy and gladness of heart in all your abundance, 48you will serve your enemies the LORD will send against you in famine, thirst, nakedness, and destitution. He will place an iron yoke on your neck until He has destroyed you. 
49The LORD will bring a nation from afar, from the ends of the earth, to swoop down upon you like an eagle—a nation whose language you will not understand, 50a ruthless nation with no respect for the old and no pity for the young. 51They will eat the offspring of your livestock and the produce of your land until you are destroyed. They will leave you no grain or new wine or oil, no calves of your herds or lambs of your flocks, until they have caused you to perish. 52They will besiege all your cities, until the high and fortified walls in which you trust have fallen in all the land. They will besiege all your cities throughout the land that the LORD your God has given you
Not only do we see our culture starting to collapse shortly after we approve of these things just like the Bible fortells it will happen, but we see a very similar trand with the ancient greek and romans, where they too shortly before the collapse embraced homosexuality and pederasty.

Now dont understand me wrong. I dont harbor any ill will against any of this groups, but tolerance towards this does simply no good, not for us and neither for them. Its because of the contrary that Im opposed to these. For example the only reason why the refugees come over is because we either bomb their country in the middle east for the sake of the fake Israel, or because we exploit their land over in Africa. Now, to get a clear conscience, we just decide to get them over here instead of stopping our ill behavior at the core and with this approve of our mutual destruction.
Similary approving of the homosexuality and similar stuff wont help them, we just encourage them in their rebellion against God and thus watch as they run off the cliff of damnation.
We are meant to love everyone unconditionally, do you think letting your loved one fall into damnation is something you should do? If your child is about to harm himself, dont you stop him and discipline him?
10Our fathers disciplined us for a short time as they thought best, but God disciplines us for our good, so that we may share in His holiness. 11No discipline seems enjoyable at the time, but painful. Later on, however, it yields a peaceful harvest of righteousness to those who have been trained by it.
 For the same reason the pacifistic and passive version of Christianity that commonly taught everyhwere is contrary to all that is preached. All throughout the OT God punished the evil and discplined them, Jesus chased out the money changers from the Temple and in the end will destroy all evil.


"Now what then about turning the other cheek" you may ask. This is a lot more nuanced than usually told.
You need to view the sermon on the mount from Gods perspective. We constantly sin against him, insult and anger him, imagine him punishing us back instantly all the time. We would have seized to exist a long time ago. So he turns the other cheek because he loves us and wants us to repeant instead of avenging himself. Straight from the OT (Ezekiel 18) 
23Do I take any pleasure in the death of the wicked? declares the Lord GOD. Wouldn’t I prefer that he turn from his ways and live?
Also if I constantly take revenge in the name of justice the family/friends will avange him for which your people will avenge yourself back and will continue to do so until eternity.


The only way to break this cycle is to make a sacrifice of yourself and forgive, forsake your rightful claim for the sake of starting an improvement. Eye for an eye will leave the whole world blind.

Also we should never act out of anger or hatred, but that does not mean to completely forsake punishment. It always is a thing from case to case.

But if anyone causes one of these little ones who believe in Me to stumble, it would be better for him to have a large millstone hung around his neck and to be drowned in the depths of the sea.
Punishments can also serve the punished. But if you act only in order to serve your anger and hatred it will just breed more of such.
We can only forgive and turn the other cheek if we are the ones who are transgressed, only then we can forsake the punishmentfor the sake of mercy. If someone is about to murder another, you are in no position to turn the other cheek or to forgive the murder and as such are required to take action and prevent it.



Then there is the issue that Jesus showed that the truth is hated so much that you can literally do nothing wrong and still will be killed because you are hated for telling the truth and doing good. He gave them no reason to kill him, he never resisted, just to show us how much the truth and goodness is hated by them. Ideally if we can do that, we should aim to do the same, waking other up to the evil of the world even if it means our own demise to show it to even more.


 Now people tend to bring up that a lot of this is based on the OT law which Jesus would have replaced, or even go so far to say the OT speaks of another god, a fake one. This last one is a line you will often hear from Gnostics which appearently believe that God must be evil for punishing evil.
So let us start with refuting the second assertion, show that OT and NT are of the same God.


Jesus himself said 
17Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them, but to fulfill them. 18For I tell you truly, until heaven and earth pass away, not a single jot, not a stroke of a pen, will disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished
The law and prophets being those of the OT. Why would the other NT God acknowledge the correctness and rightiousness of the law of the false God?

Also Jesus is High Priest in the Order of Melchizedek.

19We have this hope as an anchor for the soul, firm and steadfast. It enters the inner sanctuary behind the curtain, 20where Jesus our forerunner has entered on our behalf. He has become a high priest forever in the order of Melchizedek.


 Now who is Melchizedek? 
18Then Melchizedek king of Salem brought out bread and wine—since he was priest of God Most High— 19and he blessed Abram and said: “Blessed be Abram by God Most High, Creator of heaven and earth,
So Jesus is the high priest of the order that worships the OT God.

We also have Jesus quoting the OT to make a point and fulffilling multiple times, the OT prophecies and his name "Yahushua" even mean "Yah(Weh) saves"
Aside from all this there is also the Archangel Gabriel. In the OT he, in example, gave the prophet Daniel a revelation, in the NT we read about how he appeared the parents of Jesus and John to announce their comming birth.
We also have the names of the patriarchs in the OT announcing the arrival of God on earth

There is no way to argue that NT God is another from the OT.

Also if this world would be created by something evil, then why is it so beautiful? Why is it abbundant with ressources, food and drink? There is more than enough for everyone and its only through the corruption of a few, satan worshipping pedophiles, that we experience scarcity. So the creator is obviously good.


Now what then about the difference between OT Law and Jesus' teachings?
OT laws are basically the laws and commandments, your personal rights as given to you by God. If someone picks your eye and pulls your tooth your personal right is to pay him back (Eye for an Eye, Tooth for Tooth). 

19Why then was the law given? It was added because of transgressions, until the arrival of the seed to whom the promise referred. It was administered through angels by a mediator. 20A mediator is unnecessary, however, if there is only one party; but God is one. 
21Is the law, then, opposed to the promises of God? Certainly not! For if a law had been given that could impart life, then righteousness would certainly have come from the law. 22But the Scripture pronounces all things confined by sin, so that by faith in Jesus Christ the promise might be given to those who believe. 
23Before this faith came, we were held in custody under the law, locked up until faith should be revealed. 24So the law became our guardian to lead us to Christ, that we might be justified by faith. 25Now that faith has come, we are no longer under a guardian.
So basically the Law was given to us as a guideline on whats good and whats bad, being our guardian to not stray away from good. Giving us something to get advice from when not knowing how to handle things

19Why then was the law given? It was added because of transgressions, until the arrival of the seed to whom the promise referred. It was administered through angels by a mediator. 20A mediator is unnecessary, however, if there is only one party; but God is one. 
21Is the law, then, opposed to the promises of God? Certainly not! For if a law had been given that could impart life, then righteousness would certainly have come from the law. 22But the Scripture pronounces all things confined by sin, so that by faith in Jesus Christ the promise might be given to those who believe. 
23Before this faith came, we were held in custody under the law, locked up until faith should be revealed. 24So the law became our guardian to lead us to Christ, that we might be justified by faith. 25Now that faith has come, we are no longer under a guardian. 
 Now however, that Jesus came and established a new covenant, that gets us saved based on faith instead of our deeds this law now takes a secondary position.
It was made easier for us to be saved, as we only need to believe instead of following the law at every step, but in exchange are meant to try even harder at being a good person instead of being "not bad". Whereas previously the Law stated "plucking an eye out in revenge is fine" this is still going, but we are then meant to stop and consider wether this is the best step towards the greater good or if maybe we should forgive instead of continuing until we are all blind and toothles
Also even though we no longer are under the law the law was what God deemed good for us, and as such will still be good today. The only things that were done away with were things directly related to the old covenant, in example circumcission, whereas circumcising now means you want to live according to the covenant made with Abraham and thus reject Jesus gift.


Since this image got a bit too big to be displayed here, here is an alternative link to that image which you should be able to read
https://i.4pcdn.org/pol/1576199118479.jpg


This is probably the main problem Christianity faces nowadays, the neglection of the law and Gods advices, the rest are more or less irrelevant for the message of the Gospel itself, yet it provides more understanding of the background and refutes a lot of the other stuff used to discredit the Bibles narrative.

So the first one many like to bring up would be that so many cultures have their gods and legends, so why would the Bible of all these others be the one to be true. However generally the myths have strong similarities across the globe and as well fit the described history of the Holy Scripture.
The bible actually doesnt deny the existence of the different gods. It just says that (most of them) they are not good and non of them are to be worshipped as they are below the most high. They are even directly mentioned: 

12On that night I will pass through the land of Egypt and strike down every firstborn male, both man and beast, and I will execute judgment against all the gods of Egypt. I am the LORD.
All across the world there are numerous cultures stating how "people" came (down) to them and brought them knowledge and some new crafts and subsequently ruled over them and often there is a direct lineage claimed from these "gods" on which they claim their ruleship.
Now the Book of Enoch says exactly that, the fallen angels came to earth, they shared knowledge which in turn corrupted us. And they mated with our women. Here the account from Genesis: 
1Now when men began to multiply on the face of the earth and daughters were born to them, 2the sons of God saw that the daughters of men were beautiful, and they took as wives whomever they chose.
[...] 
4The Nephilim were on the earth in those days, and afterward as well, when the sons of God had relations with the daughters of men. And they bore them children who became the mighty men of old, men of renown.
"mighty men of old, men of renown"
kings and rulers, the children of the fallen angels.


Additionally to all this we have different stories of the (fallen) angels relate to that of the different gods, Michael for example correlates heavily with Jupiter/Zeus/Thor/Baal Haddad, Lucifer correlates with that of quetzacoatl of the aztecs and prometheus and somewhat Enki. Satan, which likely is Lucifer after the fall correlates with Moloch and Cronus. Gabriel I believe could be Mercury which is Hermes and seen as equal of Thoth


Also we should look at some terminology used to name the gods.

El likely just means "high" or powerfull" and elohim (plural of El) is the group of supernatural beings that are that, high and powerfull, and once they fell and acted as gods (annunaki, likely egyptian and aztec gods too) elohim became knows as gods
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elyon 

 ʾĒl ʿElyōn is usually rendered in English as "God Most High"
meaning that either el or elyon is most high, and El is likely high and elyon "most high" or "highest"

God occasionally is called with Elohim, which makes people claim there are multiple Gods in the bible, however there is something called the majestic plural
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_we
Basically, to signify someones outstanding position in a field you turn the designation into a plural. the master of masters in a field would be called with the plural masters, same for the highest of the high, the elyon of the elohim being called elohim. In hebrew you recognize the majestic plural by the plural designation when its used together with a singular verb or adjective which is always the case when elohim is mentioned in relation of the one God.
https://www.gotquestions.org/majestic-plural.html

calling God Elohim then means he takes a special position among the elohim which are his angels. now this also relates to some other verses
1The LORD answered Moses, “See, I have made you like God (Uses Elohim here again) to Pharaoh, and your brother Aaron will be your prophet.
stating how Moses got the special position among all highs to the pharaos. he most certainly didnt make Moses into multiple gods showing that Elohim is commonly used in Singular as well.

So „el“ is just a designation of something „high“. RaphaEL, MichaEL, GabriEL.


Similary we have "Baal"s, where as Baal just means "Lord"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baal 

Baal (/ˈbeJəl, ˈbɑːəl/),[1][a] properly Baʿal, was a title and honorific meaning "owner," "lord
There were many, earthly rulers called Baal, but also the heavenly, the different deities, all declaring themselves to be Lord.

Also "Melech" meaning King
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melech_(name)
Or ""Malak"/"Melek" being Angel being likely the source for the name of Moloch/Molek, considering that ancient scripts dont have vowels, making them all MLCH or MLK as well as showing that "Angel" and "King" share the same root.

A similar example we also find with the sumerian terminology. In Genesis 6:2 the angels are called "ḇə·nê- hā·’ĕ·lō·hîm" or "Sons of (ḇə·nê) "The" (definite article, "Ha-") God ("Elohim")
https://biblehub.com/interlinear/genesis/6-2.htm
The God being distinguished from the rest. In the sumerian pantheon there is Anu as creator God, the equivalent of Ha-Elohim/El Elyon, and the other deities are the Anu-Naki which means "Anus off spring"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anunnaki#Etymology
like the sons of God

Now we have God, he wants to reveal himself and the guy comes up saying "Who or what are you?" and since God is from beyond this world there are no terms of this world to describe him. Thus he uses earthly terms in distinguished ways. People are led by kings? He says "I am the King of Kings". They have Lords over them? God tells them "I am the Lord of Lords", they worship the Elohim, the fallen angels, the high beings, he tells them "I am the most high, El Elyon/Elohim of Elohim" using familliar terms in distinguished ways

This text here goes into great detail how God often communicates with a sort of council of elohim very similar to pantheons we find described in different pagan mythologies, as well as showing how Elohim is for example used for the spirit of the dead and such
http://www.thedivinecouncil.com/DivineCouncilLBD.pdf

So our problem basically comes from our understanding of what the term "god" actually means which was understood back then differently than we do today.

So when the stories about the gods/angels are real, then we should be able to link them to another, right? Well, this is indeed possible for a few cases I will go into, however often whenever God acts through an angel this act is basically attributed to God himself. Where pagan myths basically state exactly which god did which the Bible treats it as "God created the angels, the angels did what God told them, thus it was all God". Never the less we can link a few together.

Lets start with Jupiter
Jupiter is also known like Zeus, throwing his lightning bolts or thor with his thunder also being lightning to some extent
Michael is the one who threw Satan (Saturn, will get to that) down to earth as Zeus defeated Cronus.
The way Satan falls here is 


18So He said to them, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.
Michael threw Satan (Saturn) down to earth with lightning.
 So Zeus (Jupiter) defeated Cronus (Saturn) while also having lightning/storm powers
Thor (Jupiter) locked away Loki (While fairly antagonistic I couldnt identify him as a planet)

In all occasions its Jupiter is BTFOing Saturn (or in the nordic one at least an antagonist) with lightning

Also Baal (seemingly a mix of Baal Hadad, Jupiter, and Baal Hammon, Saturn) is known to have slayn an evil serpent and in general had enmity with snakes, Thor is the archenemy of Jörmungard, the worldserpent of loki that grew big enough to reach around the world biting its own tail making it a symbol for the world, but also being ouroboros which is a symbol of time that devours everything fitting back to chronus.
Michael threw satan down to earth, the serpent in garden eden.
Zeus killed Typhon a serpentlike monster that tried to take his throne of the cosmos.
The hindu Indra, Jupitarian deity, killed an evil Serpent while having lightning bolts as a power.
There is also in Egypt Set, the god of storms (again a link to the jupitarian deities with stoms and lightningbolts) that defeated Osiris, the god of the underworld being a link to death like Chronus is through time, and he also constantly fought the evil serpent Apep/Apophis

I have to add here that the "september prophecy" makes a connection between Jupiter and Jesus (instead of the sun which usually links to Jesus/God, will go into that).

The prophecy states a child is born and is continued to be described like Jesus is usually, when it was virgo, the virgin, birthed Jupiter in the manner the prophecy told, and Jesus is all about rejection of the flesh, of the material and embracing the spirit which gives somewhat a connection to the lightning as its the very force creating the conciousness in your brain (neural impulses animating your whole body even)
People bring up that Jesus name in greek, Iesous supposedly means "Hail Zeus", but this doesnt hold up as his name isnt Iesous but Yahushua (meaning "Yah[Weh] saves"). There is the theory that the greeks transliterated his name in such a manner to mock christians by having them hail another deity each time they refer to the saviour.
Also "Jupiter" comes from a word meaning as much as "Sky Father" as the heavenly Father which is God, but as I mentioned earlier the names of Angels all link back to God, so I can see this just being the case in foreign languages and pantheons as well.



Now the next one we can link to other deities would be the Serpent in Eden, Lucifer, which after the rebellion became Satan.
The serpent in Eden is identified as Satan 
2He seized the dragon, the ancient serpent who is the devil and Satan, and bound him for a thousand years.

Revelation describes Michael BTFOing Satan and throwing him to earth. Earlier Satans fall is described 

18So He said to them, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.
which i believe is a good link of Michael to Jupiterian deities as already mentioned and likely this is what Jesus related to when saying he is the morningstar.

Eitherway we can say from this that the serpent is Satan is the dragon is a fallen angel. This further is supported by the fact that "Seraph", the name for a class of angels means "serpent".
While the name Lucifer is not mentioned in the Bible in that way, there is a very fitting archetype of deities around doing what the serpent did, bringing knowledge and the serpent did exactly this, so we can assume that Lucifer is Satan as well.
The aztecs have Quetzacoatl, the feathered serpent that brought them knowledge, like the serpent in Eden, and he is identified as the planet Venus which is Lucifer when appearing as morningstar.
Similary the chinese have their legends of dragons, flying serpents essentially, that brought them wisdom.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucifer 
Lucifer (/ˈljuːsJfər/ LEW-si-fər) is a name that, according to dictionaries of the English language, refers either to the Devil or to the planet Venus when appearing as the morning star.
Just like the Venus, associated with Lucifer, and even called Lucifer when appearing as morning star, The Lucifer will at some point not the morningstar anymore, not Lucifer, Satan that was Lucifer and then fell.
Same as the Pentagram, which gets drawn with the Earth and Venus, can be a symbol of protection (when pointing up) or of evil (when pointing down) having the same symbolism behind it as the planet Venus and Lucifer/Satan has







The 2 (Venus and Saturn) being connected (via Lucifer-Satan) gives also then some connections to the bull symbolism of moloch when he ruled possibly back then still as lucifer and thus is the golden calf as Venus is the planet that rules over Taurus.

Also relating to this is Prometheus who brought the fire (knowledge) and because of this Pandora (a woman like Eve) unleashed all the Evil (Sin).


"But you said Satan is Saturn" I hear some of you saying. Well, there are 2 things I should add. First is that the planets seem rather as symbols than entities. When Lucifer/Satan was still obeying God and doing what he was told, he was close to God, the sun, and a figure of light. Angels are generally androgyn, having no gender and when he was serving God he subservient, a female trait and as such venus is often a symbol of the feminine. Also Venus is generally related with fertility, with life, and there is a good case to be made that Eve had sex with the Serpent which created Cain, which relates back to the fertility. Then however he rebelled, he moved away from God, aligned himself with Saturn. He tried to usurp God, acting as a patriarch, becoming male.
Another issue is that sometimes lineages in the Bible seem to be conflated. Where for example pagan stories go into detail into an off spring of a god, and the deeds of the offspring as well as the offspring of this one too, the Bible conflates the entire lineage, for example as Satan.

So what are the points to link Satan to Saturn?
Where as Gods symbolism is around the Sun and light Saturn stands in Duality to this. In example in Alchemy the Sun is Gold, perfection, whereas Saturn is lead (base/ruin)
Saturn being the planet the furthest away from the sun still visible with the naked eye, the furthest away from God.
The 6th planet with the hexagon on its northpole forming the cube. (both satanic symbolism)
Being in greek the embodiment of time and thus ultimately decay and death like Satan, is the source of sin with sin causing our death/mortallity.
The 6s in its seal

The 6s encoded in the the Seal of Solomon (6 small triangles with 60° corners) and the hexagon.
Sun is associated with Gold (perfection and the highest) in alchemy as Saturn is Lead (being in ruin and the lowest), polar opposites once again
Saturn in Astrology is ruling the Karma which Buddhists say traps us in this world just like the Sin which Satan brought, brought us into this world

The image above then shows clearly who their god is, Satan, this material world and their own ego.
The square in the image, which incorporates the origin of the Masons Logo is even associated with Saturn
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magic_square#Europe_after_15th_century



Now since we are at identifying Satan, we might as well go into what satanism actually is.
Satan meant something like "obstacle", "enemy" or "adversary". Everyone has his own Satans. Someone who incites him to do bad things, a bad habbit, an addiction, anything he should overcome. But then there also is THE Satan, Ha-Satan.

6 is the number of man, and his weakness. greed, egoism, egocentrism, all the materialistic desires, and i believe of this plane existence in general (the earth is tilted 23,4 degrees, or if you count from the other direction 66.6 degrees, life, on this planet at least, is made of carbon, the 6th element, with 6 protons, 6 neutrons and 6 electrons. 6 directions in the material realm, north, south, west, east, up and down, 6 sides of the cubes.

Think About how molecules and icecrystals form in hexagonal shapes. Saturn being the 6th planet with hexagon on its northpole). 666, the number of the beast, is going over the top with the materialistic desires, pursuing and desiring only those and making you follow the path of satan.

The black cube of satan is a symbol for this material, 3 dimensional realm, and the time we fear is running out, which will let us die, and which causes us to do harm to others in order to lead a better life ourself. Thus the black cube also symbolizes time and death without either we wouldnt have these earthly desires causing us to do evil.
The 666 could also stand for the dimensions of the cube, 6x6x6, entrapping us in the 6, our weakness and temptations.

Our sole puprose, as i believe it, is to overcome (our) satan, proof we arent easily corrupted wether satan is just a symbol or a real entity. So while this world isnt evil itself, this realm of existence kind of makes the corruption a lot easier. When people worship satan, they dont worship some deity or enthity (well, some do that too). They worship this material world, the materialistic egoistic desires, and themselves.

Those 7 circles are called the seed of life.

One interpretation I saw is that its meant to symbolize the creation week, or symbolize the same as the creation week does in the bible
The center being conciousness, that expands to the circle. The conciousness then moves to the border of the circle where it expands again creating the second circle and so on until you got the seed of life. The 6 days of creation around the 7th one, God, the seed of life or whatever you want to call it.
By connecting the points of intersection you gain the (black) cube, as above mentioned symbolizing the material world and as such Satans rule.

I have to say here that the 6, and all these patterns are commonly seen as a positive symbol as it is the blueprint of creation of life, but its only the material part of this, and according to the Bible the source of temptations, the Satan's, which we should work on overcoming with

So in this light atheism is low key satanism as both are about the material, about power, wealth, the flesh.
Christianity is about rejection of the flesh and embrace of the spirit. Where christianity tells you everything is God, thus you yourself too and everything else it means everything is connected to you while satanism and atheism teach seperation. No underlying connections and thus seperation leads to worship of the self, and only caring about the ego.
Where satanists and atheist desire to be blessed in this life and having it comfy christianity tells you you will have it hard in this life, persecuted and attacked for doing the right thing, so you may have delight in the next live instead and improve the lives of others, and through our inherent connections improves your own.

There is another theory for the origin of the number 666 which I have trouble confirming, but yet fits fairly well, thus I will include it and maybe one of you is able to find something more.
Supposedly the Babylonians worshipped primarily 36 deities. Each of those deities were assigned a number from 1 to 36. Adding the numbers from 1 to 36 together each it will result in 666
Now the deities, like angels are aspects of creations, basically are the material world. Thus the 666 relates to the angels/gods as a collective and as such as world from which the materialism stems from.

The christian cross on the other hand symbolizes the cube being broken open, freeing us from the material prison it symbolizes

In general a lot of christian symbolism goes back to the sun. In example the cross with the circle around, also called suncross likely comes from the zodiac cross upon which the sun "stands". The Halo or Nimbus you see on a lot of saints, and also other divine figures from other mythologies originally also was just a shining light from behind the person or persons head. In case of Jesus specifically the halo often has the suncross e
mbedded in it too.

So while "Jews and muslims have Saturn as their symbol of God, Christianity has the sun.
In case of the "Star of David" it likely is Saturn trying to immitate God (with the 33 and the sun symbolism) to make Gods power his own

while we are at it, a lot of the symbols also seem to derive from sunworship as many symbols do. in case of the egypt one it seems to depict the sun touching the water or heaven being united with the earth while unification of polar opposites is an important theme in the occult. One believe was that magic springs into existence where 2 polar opposites meet. good and evil, the above and below, male and female. especially the unification of the last is one of the most holy events in many cultures where the magic of life happens and the first step for the existence of a new human has been made. i believe transgenderism is a perverted form of this, trying to unite male and female in one body/destroying duality
People even claim that Jesus is just a metaphore for the sun. Son/sun of God, turns water into whine like the sun giving light and energy to the grapes which turn the water into whine, walking on water like the sun when rising or setting behind the ocean standing right on the surface (look at that pic of the egyptian ankh with the other sun symbolisms) making the blind see by giving light and in general being the source of life by giving heat and energy. The 12 apostles like the 12 zodiacs. Jesus being put on a cross, while the sun (astrologically) stands on a cross marking the 4 seasons. He is often depicted with a halo, which originally is just a shining light from behind the person (light like from the sun) also together with suncross in its halo giving further connections to the jesus/sun relationship. Rising from the dead on the 3rd day like the sun being at its lowest (dead) for 3 days during the winter solstice to then rise again

But there is again the small saying "as above, so below" This has many implications.

one is that what happens in the stars happens on the earth (astrology)
this furthermore means the small things are the same as the big and made of the same (fractal universe) Like electrons orbit the nucleus the planets orbit the the sun which orbits the center of the galaxy etc
https://youtube.com/watch?v=ycvlJ9XMd94
Your mind (above) influences the material world (below) and vice versa.
What happens in the heavens happens on the earth to and vice versa.
And of course as the Sun of God above, so does the Son of God below

also this pic

relating back to when i mentioned that everything is from and within God, making all the charges in this world possibly kind of neural impuls (skip to the bit about the Logos where I go more into this theory)

Satanism is about the rejection of God and his values, embracement of his teachings. 

19The acts of the flesh are obvious: sexual immorality, impurity, and debauchery; 20idolatry and sorcery; hatred, discord, jealousy, and rage; rivalries, divisions, factions, 21and envy; drunkenness, orgies, and the like. I warn you, as I did before, that those who practice such things will not inherit the kingdom of God. 
22But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, 23gentleness, and self-control. Against such things there is no law.
Also all the stuff God forbids throughout the Bible, from homosexuality to racemixing, and general degeneracy, lying, theft, murder, deceit and subversion, pride, all this is what satanism is all about, complete egoism, materialism and hedonism.
So Satanism is embracement of all the degeneracy that God forbids and which the satanists at the top push and and enduldge in.
By allying with Satan you ally in any way you ally with all that plagues our world.

At the foundation of all satanism there are a bunch of ultra retarded SJW whose entire philosophical basis is that God is a tyrannical fascist and a bigot for not allowing them to whore around as much as they want. God demands selfmoderation and aspiration to become something great. (((They))) believe these laws, instead of guidelines and advices for prosperity and a good life, are chains and limitations holding them back from doing what they want, from their self fulfillment, from basically sticking their dick into every hole they can find. That is the foundation of Satanism, forsaking Morals and laws so you can be a degenerate piece of shit, living like an animal according to the flesh, living as the BEAST


Now that we discussed how satanism and thus evil manifests, the next question is "why does God allow evil to take place in the first place?" as this issue often makes people claim that God isnt wholly good, or even that he must be evil himself, which logically is impossible.
God is the sole authority, meaning he decides what is good and what is bad. Because of this God can only be wholly good. Since noone willingly decides to create something bad all he created was good ("and God saw it was good"). Evil is then whatever alters this state of goodness, that which disturbs the balance and harmony and thus is directly opposed to God, goodness and creation.
Now God gave us free will, and free will requires us to be able to choose wrong or else it would be no choice at all. So evil comes from ourselves by using our free will to go against Gods law and will.
Now God has 2 options when we commit evil 
-be God 
-humans rebell thinking they know better whats right and wrong 
-you destroy those that rebelled and show love to those that didnt 
-couple aeons later another retards gets to think he knows better and starts the same bullshit
or 
-be God 
-humans start thinking they know better 
-you let them play out all of their retarded ideas until the end, constantly reminding them what you told them 
-they fuck shit up, realize that they were retarded pieces of shit and realize that God was right the whole time 
-they repent 
-you fix everything in the end 
-noone ever gets any stupid ideas as we had all possible stupid ideas already and lived them out till the very end undoubtly proving eternally that they are just stupid ideas 
-live happily ever after with everyone
Due to our arrogance which will eventually make us fall into the same delusions of thinking to know better I guess it has to be that we first have to live through all the evil. After all we ate the fruit of knowledge of good and evil, and thus need to learn of both. God taught us before which is good, and now we are left to learn what evil is.

This same can be applied to why Satan is left to mess around. The book of Job explains it fairly well. To summerize:
God and Satan have a talk where God tells of how good and faithful Job is, Satan however says Job only praises him because God gave him all these things and if they were to be taken away Job would stop praising God. As such God allows him to take all he has, trying to get him away from God, just to realize in the end that even when everything is lost Job still praises God and that Satan was wrong.
This story is playing out globally right now since the fruit. You can imagine Satan as the first born son, being envious that his little brother, humanity/Job gets attention and love,  and not he alone as he was used to. Thinking that we are not worthy of his love. As such he tries to make his little brother appear appear in a bad light, by corrupting him/us and trying to turn him away from our father, just to realize in the end that he was wrong about us and that God once again was correct.
So I believe that God wants even Satan to repeant in the end.
9The Lord is not slow to fulfill His promise as some understand slowness, but is patient with you, not wanting anyone to perish but everyone to come to repentance.

Now why did he give the possibility to do evil/wrong? Its simple, free will. And free will requires the ability to choose, and if you cant choose wrong you dont choose at all. As such for free will to exist so does the possibility of evil needs to exist (not evil itself mind you).
Or to say it differently, to do good free will is required, as without the choice to do evil, and resisting it for the sake of good, doing the good thing would just be following a programming, and thus can hardly be called good when you didnt have another chance.
So to give us a chance at true goodness he gave us free will, and this free will requires the chance to do evil, and now we are in the time where evil is tolerated for us to realize it leads to ruin and be rebuked by us. Making us learn that Gods law is just and good by showing us where lawlesness leads to

Many say that the fruit actually gave us conciousnes and free will, and that God wanted us to be stupid slaves and that the serpent actually liberated us from opression. Now this doesnt hold up as without free will we couldnt have gone against Gods command to eat it.
Neither does God wants us stupid, he gave Solomon all the wisdom freely for example. I think the reason we werent supposed to eat it was that we just werent ready. We were just created, figuring out how to name things that God created for us. You wait until you figured the most basic stuff out until tackling a difficult subject like morality.
Also its important to see to note what Eve was tempted with:
5“For God knows that in the day you eat of it, your eyes will be opened and you will be like God, knowing good and evil.”
"You will be like God". Up til then we were ruled over by God through his morality, the fruit was basically allowing us to make up our own morality and thus no longer be ruled over anymore.
Large part of luciferian/satanic philosophy is argumentation about how there is no objective good and evil, that its whatever you want, and thus you are free to do whatever you want. They perceive laws and morals, instead of advices and guidelines for a prosper life and society, as chains and limitations that keep them from doing what they really want, masking their evil merely as freedom and liberation. This is what the fruit represents. Casting off Gods morality, making our own, thus "liberating" us from Gods law and making up our own and thus rule over others, "being like God". And now, like mentioned before, we need to play these things out to realize that the only proper morality is that of God.

Another layer tells the story of becoming adults. We were like children in garden Eden, not even caring about nakedness. Then however we grew up, learning that good and evil exists, represented by the fruit, and subsequently Paradise was lost as evil entered our worlds/minds. We became adults, ashamed of our nakedness and knowing good and evil. In this case being banished wasnt a punishment but the natural result of realizing the existence of evil.

There is also an evolutionary layer about it. We gained knowledge, and because of this our women are cursed to have great birthing pains, due to the big heads needed for our intelligence, causing far greater pain in birth than animals have it. The serpent was cursed to crawl on its belly, evolution tells us the snakes lost their legs at some point which is mirrored by the curse.

A really interesting take on the meaning of Genesis I found here
https://sites.google.com/site/livingwithoutmoney/Home/the-seven-headed-dragon
Basically this text claims that the whole genesis story of the bible relates to banking and usury through puns and wordplays.
So is Cain a wordplay on "purchase" and the snake decieving can mean "loaning" "hiring" "Indebting" or something along those lines. So when Eve said
>The serpent deceived me
it means Eve was loaned something, from which cain, the serpent seed (this text here makes a really good case for the Cain being the offspring of Eve and the Serpent while Abel is from Adam and Eve http://theopenscroll.com/cainsPaternity.htm ), the purchase was born. The same wordplay between decieve or credited/loaned also fits "snakebite". This means the deception is the loan/credit which is the deadly venomous bite of snake/creditor. The word "Canaan" is also related to Cain and means as much as "commerce" or "trade". The Canaanites are as I believe off spring of Cain. So the snake indebted Eve and Adam, which created the purchase, cain, which resulted in Adam and Eve leaving paradise. The purchase or trade, Cain, also becomes the first murderer. The land of Canaan, the land of trade and commerce is where todays Israel is. Canaanites by this definition are everyone who fell for the greed of the commerce, and these are also the same people the God told his people to completly wipe out.

When later Noah got drunk on wine making Ham see his Nakedness (Usually seen as either raping Noah, his father, or fucking Noahs wife/his mother) this is also a play on word meaning that he was hired. By hiring/loaning his father he raped him. Later when the bible speaks of nations or persons getting drunk on the wine it implies them loaning money, which makes them feel like drunk, euphoric, resulting in degeneracy, blasphemy and evil in general through the spirit of commerce that dwells in them.

However I believe this is just one of many meanings of Genesis which are all right and important

Yet another layer
Men would be happy to just sit in their cave by the fire and make funny noises. Women need to care for their children. As such they look for a partner that can provide for the children. This is partly done spiritually (being a good and caring father) but also materielistically. The Woman needs a man that can get food and such while she is looking after the child. Fittingly there are heavy implications that the fruit was about procreation, and that through this the sin came into the world. From this civilization is born as men create more and more sophisticated ways to show that they can provide for the child and woo the woman.
This genetical predisposition is why the Serpent tempted Eve first, and with what did he tempt her: 
5“For God knows that in the day you eat of it, your eyes will be opened and you will be like God, knowing good and evil.”
"you will be like God"
A better life. We could now go into how the fruit and tree are also a metaphore for sex with the serpent which bore Cain. As such it may was implied that Eve thought that the Serpent would be a good father for her child 
6When the woman saw that the tree was good for food and pleasing to the eyes, and that it was desirable for obtaining wisdom, she took the fruit and ate it. She also gave some to her husband, who was with her, and he ate it.
Similary the satanic Goat head resembles the Uterus, being the embodiment of the pleasures of the flesh and also bringing us into this world ruled by Satan.

Similary the serpent crawls on the ground, is attached to materialism which is biblically a cause for evil and as such is a symbol for this too, materialism and evil, and because of the womans natural predisposition it was her that the serpent approached
Basically, while not really being evil the woman caused a dominoeffect of evil similar to Pandora who because of Prometheus (who brought fire instead of knowledge) opened her box to unleash all evil

So after we discussed the first sin, the meaning of the story and why God "allows" (rather tolerates) our sin, maybe we should look into what exactly sin is:
As starting point we use that God is wholly good on the premise of being perfect alone as evil is imperfection. To sin, and thus do evil, is to miss our purpose.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sin 
Sin has many classifications and degrees, but the principal classification is that of "missing the mark" (cheit in Hebrew).
the mark we should aim for being perfection that is lawfulness in completion.

even the greek word translated as sin plays into this
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamartia 

The term hamartia derives from the Greek ἁμαρτία, from ἁμαρτάνειν hamartánein, which means "to miss the mark" or "to err"
Our pupose being perfection. So doing evil is doing something wrong, being imperfect meaning a perfect being, like God inadvertedly is, is wholly good.
Another big misrepresentation is that of the afterlife and judgement, especialy how non believers are dealt with. So the question is "what happens to us after death?"
First I went and looked up exactly how the afterlife is described in OT and NT, which is like the following:

Sheol (OT)
-Below the earth (Genesis 37:35, Genesis 42:38
-Deep and down below (Deuteronomy 32:22, 1Samuel 2:6, (1 Kings 2:6+9, Amos 9:2, Job 7:9, Job 11:8, Job 17:16, Proverbs 15:24)
-Place of the dead (Genesis 37:35, Genesis 42:38
-Can be entered alive (Numbers 16:30-33, Psalm 55:15)
-Has entangeling cords (2Samuel 22:6, Psalm 18:5)
-Not able to return from (Job 7:9)
-Has Gates (Job 17:16
-Possibly connected to Abbadon and the bottomless pit in revelation (Job 26:6, Provers 27:20)
-No mention of God in it, and noone can praise him from there (Psalm 6:5)
-Has anguish (Psalm 116:3)
-Never satisfied (Proverbs 27:20, Proverbs 30:16)
-Barren (Proverbs 30:16)
-Consuming fire (Proverbs 30:16)
-Something one wants to avoid (Psalm 30:3)
-Large appetite (Habakkuk 2:5)
-Can be avoided (Proverbs 15:24)
-Is unrelenting (Songs 8:6)
-Steals the sinners" (Job 24:19)
-The wicked and the nations that forget God return to Sheol (Psalm 9:17)
-Faithfuls soul will not be abbandoned to Sheol (Psalm 16:10)
-Eager to meet wicked, great equalizer, a bed of worms and maggots (Isaiah 14:9-11)


Hades (NT)
-Down below (Matthew 11:23, Luke 10:15)
-Has Gates (Matthew 16:18)
-Place of the dead (Luke 16:22-23)
-Rightous get send elsewhere upon death (Or are put in a seperate area from the unrighthous and unfaithfull one) (Luke 16:22-23)
-Other (dead souls) cant traverse into or out of Hades (or region of Hades) (Luke 16:22-26)
-Faithfuls soul will not be abbandoned to Hades (Acts 2:27 [referencing Psalm 16:10 relating it to Sheol])
-Jesus holds the keys to Hades (Revelation 1:18)
-Follows Death (the Horseman) (Revelation 6:8)
-Releases the dead at the end to be judged (Revelation 20:13)
-Gets thrown into the lake of fire together with Death (Revelation 20:14)


There is additionally Gehenna, the place where judgement takes place, described as unquenchable fire (Mark 9:43) where the body is destroyed, relating to the second death
https://biblehub.com/greek/1067.htm
This is what people think off when they think of hell, (depending on the translation Sheol, Hades and Gehenna are called hell, even though Gehenna is distinguished from the former) but this isnt eternal torture either.

So on this we can assume that both, Sheol and Hades are the same thing and merely different language on the same thing. This both is what the KJV calls hell. However from this follows that Hell is not eternal but only lasts until Judgement Day.
As such the story, if I got everything right goes like this:
Eventualy shit will get really bad and God comes in to destroy evil. Then the faithful are ressurected becoming the leaders and priests in his 1000 year kingdom. After this reign Hades will give their dead up, the ressurection, and they will be judged according to their hearts (Romans 2:14-16) Then Hades and death are thrown into the lake of fire as well as anyone not in the book of life (meaning that Hades, death as well as the one judged to be too evil getting destroyed, the second death). Then a new Earth and Heaven Will be made (Revelation 21) and everyone lived happily ever after.

the stuff about the eternal punishment seems to go back to when Satan was released from his pit after 1000 years, and tries to get the people into battle
>9And they marched across the broad expanse of the earth and surrounded the camp of the saints and the beloved city. But fire came down from heavena and consumed them. 10And the devil who had deceived them was thrown into the lake of fire and sulfur, into which the beast and the false prophet had already been thrown. There they will be tormented day and night forever and ever.
Being not what people refer to as hell (which is hades and Sheol) but the lake of fire that comes afterwards. And he isnt tormented "forever and ever" but for "aeons after aeons" or "age after age" and is reserved for Satan, the beast and false prophet


There is also the issue that people claim that christian claim to be better than others as they get saved.
When a Christian says you are going to hell unless you believe its not meant to be demeaning or insulting, nor is it meant to portray themselves as better or even as Saints. In fact its quite the opposite. Its a display of compassion that they care for what happens to you. It is meant to tell you that we ALL are sinners, no matter how small, and no matter how small the sin is it is grounds for damnation. 
23For the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord.
In fact God wouldnt even need a reason to send us into oblivion if he desires to, we are his regardless and he can do as he pleases 
19One of you will say to me, “Then why does God still find fault? For who can resist His will?” 20But who are you, O man, to talk back to God? Shall what is formed say to Him who formed it, “Why have you made me like this?”g 21Does not the potter have the right to make from the same lump of clay one vessel for special occasions and another for common use? 22What if God, intending to show His wrath and make His power known, bore with great patience the vessels of His wrath, prepared for destruction? 23What if He did this to make the riches of His glory known to the vessels of His mercy, whom He prepared in advance for glory
However it is because he loves us, despite our faults and errors, our blasphemies and aggression against him, that our existence can still be justified, through Gods love and mercy. Without this EVERY Christian would be just as damned. This is the great difference between believers and non believers, as we realized our faults and admit them and try to overcome them instead of masking them as "natural" or "normal" and endulge ourselves into it further. All God desires is that we recognize and choose the truth, that is Jesus Christ, over the lie no matter how comforting the lie is. Choose good over evil by choosing to follow Christ and accept his salvation

So "why do good at all if the deeds dont do anything" you may ask. Because we love God and are thankful for everything he did, and as such we want to do what pleases him out of gratitude and our love for him. Also because we are meant to love everyone, even our enemies, unconditionally, and thus want everyone and everything to be well, because you love them, and what God told us is good is good for everyone and everything that we love. 
19Do you not know that your body is a temple of the Holy Spirit who is in you, whom you have received from God? You are not your own; 20you were bought at a price. Therefore glorify God with your body

If you love God you worship and praise him. And its the temple in which the worship and the sacrifices are done. So this body is the temple in which and through which we should worship our Father, not because we must, Jesus was the ultimate sacrifice after which no other is required anymore, but because we want. And these sacrifices are our energy, our time, even ourselves, by using these to do what God wants us to do, to do good, because we love him.
21Not everyone who says to Me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only he who does the will of My Father in heaven. 22Many will say to Me on that day, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in Your name, and in Your name drive out demons and perform many miracles?’ 23Then I will tell them plainly, ‘I never knew you; depart from Me, you workers of lawlessness!

You see here they basically tried to get their way into heaven through their good deeds instead of just doing them because they are the right thing to do.

7So He said to them again, “Truly, truly, I tell you, I am the gate for the sheep. 8All who came before Me were thieves and robbers, but the sheep did not listen to them. 9I am the gate. If anyone enters through Me, he will be saved. He will come in and go out and find pasture. 10The thief comes only to steal and kill and destroy. I have come that they may have life, and have it in all its fullness. 11I am the good shepherd. The good shepherd lays down His life for the sheep. 12The hired hand is not the shepherd, and the sheep are not his own. When he sees the wolf coming, he abandons the sheep and runs away. Then the wolf pounces on them and scatters the flock. 13The man runs away because he is a hired servant and is unconcerned for the sheep. 14I am the good shepherd. I know My sheep and My sheep know Me, 15just as the Father knows Me and I know the Father. And I lay down My life for the sheep. 16I have other sheep that are not of this fold. I must bring them in as well, and they will listen to My voice. Then there will be one flock and one shepherd.
Do you recognize the voice of Jesus, that is the truth in his teachings,? Do you feel called by those and chose to follow them? Then you are on the right path and very likely one of his sheep.
Since we are at doing good, we should look into the purpose of the chosen people.
So what are the Chosen people? Originally it were the descendent of Abraham>Isaac>Jacob by blood. With Christ however everyone who believes in and follows him is heir to the promise of given to Abraham.
However the meaning of "chosen" I believe is widely misrepresented. For example the "Chosen people cant do wrong, everything they do is the will of God and totally ok and anyone opposing them will be cursed" is just some pilpul probably coming from the Talmud. Chosen means chosen to spread the word of God across the world. Chosen to display the glory of God through your own deeds and letting them know your father through you. Chosen to lead as a good example. 
9There will be trouble and distress for every human being who does evil, first for the Jew, then for the Greek; 10but glory, honor, and peace for everyone who does good, first for the Jew, then for the Greek. 11For God does not show favoritism.
Meant to be that good example we are the first to be rewarded, so that other people see the mercy and generousity of God, but we are also the first to be punished when doing wrong, so the others see what misbehavior leads to and because it would be Hypocritical to tolerate with your own people what they do while punishing other
Also remember that not the modern "Jews" are the chosen, but the Christians.

 I also see people struggling with the principle of the Trinity and the meaning of Logos.
The best way to view it is to see this world to be like a thought or dream of God. Then those vibrations all around us might actually be kind of brainwaves and the different charges around us neural impulses. i think in that concept also lies the holy trinity
Imagine this world like a dream, or thought of God. In your dream your mind/conciousness makes up the entire world. This is the holy spirit. You can then appear as an avatar of yourself in it and interact with people directly. This would be the equivalent of the son. Then there is the you outside the dream which then possibly is the Father. Now considering the occult principle of As above, so below, we can deduce that the higher realms relate to the lower ones, like our, this, world relates to our dreams.

>1In the beginning was the Word (Logos), and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
Now imagining that "in the beginning was the word" actually meant "thought" or "concepts"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logos
than it pretty much fits i believe

this world is created from patterns>pater>father who is in heaven. The Logos, which is God, but God is so much more than these Logos (some people trying to equate him with the creation, when God is the creation and so much more) Not only geometrical ones (sacred geometry) we find in matter but also conceptual ones. "Opposites attract another", which i explained in some of my other posts, is one of these patterns, we have it in social relationship, electromagnetism, particle physics. These are the Logos quite likely too. These patterns emerge all across creation, spiritually and materialistic. And through this we can understand heavenly concepts through earthly means. and as such the heavenly father can be described (to some extent at least) by earthly means as well.

The Logos relates to the logic, the patterns>pater>father who is in heaven. This world is made up of patterns. These patterns can be geometric ones, like the pentagram and infamous hexagram which make up the material part of the world (sacred geometry) and can be found all over nature like the golden ratio, Pi and Fibbonaci sequence as well which too are just mathematical patterns that can be expressed in geometric patterns.

There are also immaterial patterns around, like "opposites attract another", working in sociology as opposed personalities often get along well, in electromagnetism, positive and negative poles attracting another, or general physics with matter and antimatter creating a big boom when coming together.
The laws of physics are a set of patterns on how things behave. And one pattern can emerge in various ways in different fields like the opposites i mentioned. Patterns in this world also relate to patterns in the spiritual world and all other worlds, as above, so below, or: 
18Truly I tell you, whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven.
hinting to a causal relation between the 2. So thats why Jesus and the Bible in general speaks in metaphores of farming, shepherding or even craftmanship because that is what people have experience with and could relate to, and these embodying the same patterns that work in heaven that he is describing with.

All the used patterns clearly hint towards intelligent design rather than randomness, thus being a hint towards God 
20For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen, being understood from His workmanship, so that men are without excuse


I think this was it widely regarding the moral and metaphysical doctrines and teachings, so now let us go into the History the Bible tells us.

One of the talkingpoints I see being brought up repeatedly is that Jesus never existed. So to counter this some extra-canonical evidence for Jesus and his life

Mark 15 tells us 
And the sixth hour having come, darkness came over the whole land until the ninth hour

Matthew 27:51: 
"And the earth shook and the rocks were split"

The secular Roman historian Phlegon documented an eclipse and earthquake around the exact same time, matching the Gospel account: 
in the fourth year of the 202nd Olympiad, an eclipse of the sun happened, greater and more excellent than any that had happened before it; at the sixth hour, day turned into dark night, so that the stars were seen in the sky, and an earthquake in Bithynia toppled many buildings of the city of Nicaea

http://www.tertullian.org/fathers/jerome_chronicle_03_part2.htm

Africanus in 221 AD 
On the whole world there pressed a most fearful darkness; and the rocks were rent by an earthquake, and many places in Judea and other districts were thrown down. This darkness Thallus, in the third book of his History, calls, as appears to me without reason, an eclipse of the sun. For the Hebrews celebrate the passover on the 14th day according to the moon, and the passion of our Savior falls on the day before the passover; but an eclipse of the sun takes place only when the moon comes under the sun. And it cannot happen at any other time but in the interval between the first day of the new moon and the last of the old, that is, at their junction: how then should an eclipse be supposed to happen when the moon is almost diametrically opposite the sun

He references here Thallus who wrote his work "around 52 AD" which has been lost in time though, but is referenced by Africanus.

Also geological evidence of a heavy earthquake in/around 33 AD
https://www.icr.org/article/greatest-earthquakes-bible/
The earthquake was not some random one, but a heavy which there wasnt one alike in almost 70 Years 
The sedimentation rate puts this second earthquake about 65 years after the 31 B.C. earthquake. It seems that the crucifixion earthquake of 33 A.D
King Abgar V had an exchange of words with Jesus
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abgar_V
Historian Eusebius quotes the Edessan archives: 
Abgar, ruler of Edessa, to Jesus the good physician who has appeared in the country of Jerusalem, greeting. I have heard the reports of you and of your cures as performed by you without medicines or herbs. For it is said that you make the blind to see and the lame to walk, that you cleanse lepers and cast out impure spirits and demons, and that you heal those afflicted with lingering disease, and raise the dead. And having heard all these things concerning you, I have concluded that one of two things must be true: either you are God, and having come down from heaven you do these things, or else you, who does these things, are the son of God. I have therefore written to you to ask you if you would take the trouble to come to me and heal all the ill which I suffer. For I have heard that the Jews are murmuring against you and are plotting to injure you. But I have a very small yet noble city which is great enough for us both


Jesus: 
Blessed are you who hast believed in me without having seen me. For it is written concerning me, that they who have seen me will not believe in me, and that they who have not seen me will believe and be saved. But in regard to what you have written me, that I should come to you, it is necessary for me to fulfill all things here for which I have been sent, and after I have fulfilled them thus to be taken up again to him that sent me. But after I have been taken up I will send to you one of my disciples, that he may heal your disease and give life to you and yours.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tacitus_on_Christ 
Christus, from whom the name [Note by OP: Christians] had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of one of our procurators, Pontius Pilatus, and a most mischievous superstition, thus checked for the moment, again broke out not only in Judæa
It is claimed that Jesus was inserted later in Tacitus in place of some other name.
However what was done was that a single letter was changed, from chrestianos to christianos which you see under UV light, which may even was just a typo he instantly corrected himself.

Regardless of when or who changed it, it spoke of a Chrestus/Christus, persecuted by Pilate who is the namegiver for the Christians. Its only Jesus that fits that description, wether it was written chrestus or christus. Even more so when its speculated that this is how you wrote the title originally.
 From the Ante-Nicene Fathers, a letter from King Abgar to Tiberius Caesar
https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Ante-Nicene_Fathers/Volume_VIII/Memoirs_of_Edessa_And_Other_Ancient_Syriac_Documents/Moses_of_Chorene/Chapter_8 
Abgar, king of Armenia, to my Lord Tiberius, emperor of the Romans, greeting:—
I know that nothing is unknown to your Majesty, but, as your friend, I would make you better acquainted with the facts by writing. The Jews who dwell in the cantons of Palestine have crucified Jesus: Jesus without sin, Jesus after so many acts of kindness, so many wonders and miracles wrought for their good, even to the raising of the dead. Be assured that these are not the effects of the power of a simple mortal, but of God. During the time that they were crucifying Him, the sun was darkened, the earth was moved, shaken; Jesus Himself, three days afterwards, rose from the dead and appeared to many. Now, everywhere, His name alone, invoked by His disciples, produces the greatest miracles: what has happened to myself is the most evident proof of it. Your august Majesty knows henceforth what ought to be done in future with respect to the Jewish nation, which has committed this crime; your Majesty knows whether a command should not be published through the whole universe to worship Christ as the true God.

The answer from Tiberius 
Tiberius, emperor of the Romans, to Abgar, king of the Armenians, greeting:
Your kind letter has been read to me, and I wish that thanks should be given to you from me. Though we had already heard several persons relate these facts, Pilate has officially informed us of the miracles of Jesus. He has certified to us that after His resurrection from the dead He was acknowledged by many to be God. Therefore I myself also wished to do what you propose; but, as it is the custom of the Romans not to admit a god merely by the command of the sovereign, but only when the admission has been discussed and examined in full senate, I proposed the affair to the senate, and they rejected it with contempt, doubtless because it had not been considered by them first. But we have commanded all those whom Jesus suits, to receive him amongst the gods. We have threatened with death any one who shall speak evil of the Christians. As to the Jewish nation which has dared to crucify Jesus, who, as I hear, far from deserving the cross and death, was worthy of honour, worthy of the adoration of men—when I am free from the war with rebellious Spain, I will examine into the matter, and will treat the Jews as they deserve

From Flavius Josephus
http://www.documentacatholicaomnia.eu/03d/0037-0103,_Flavius_Josephus,_The_Antiquities_Of_The_Jews,_EN.pdf 
3. Now there was about this time Jesus, a wise man, if it be lawful to call him a man; for he was a doer of wonderful works, a teacher of such men as receive the truth with pleasure. He drew over to him both many of the Jews and many of the Gentiles. He was [the] Christ. And when Pilate, at the suggestion of the principal men amongst us, had condemned him to the cross, those that loved him at the first did not forsake him; for he appeared to them alive again the third day; as the divine prophets had foretold these and ten thousand other wonderful things concerning him. And the tribe of Christians,
Its claimed that the passage of Josephus was inserted later as the earliest manuscript seem to not have this one, but there is another passage
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Josephus_on_Jesus 
Modern scholarship has largely acknowledged the authenticity of the second reference to Jesus in the Antiquities, [...] which mentions "the brother of Jesus, who was called Christ, whose name was James."

Another claim that is made constantly is that the Bible would say the Earth is flat and 6000 years old. Both are not supported by scripture.
https://creation.com/isaiah-40-22-circle-sphere
the infamous "circle of the earth" verse is just a mistranslation. the word used is "חוּג" or "chug/khûg" which translates to 
class, group activity ; group, circle (of people) ; (geography) tropic, sphere
"sphere"
And while we are at it, the earth being 6000 years old also isnt biblical, its merely around when the story of Adam and Eve starts, and furthermore the word translated as "day" is "Yom" which can mean hour, day, week, month, year, or any undefined amount of time. 2 Peter 3:8 even says
>8Beloved, do not let this one thing escape your notice: With the Lord a day is like a thousand years, and a thousand years are like a day.
In this image for example

it shows that what is translated as "The world was formless and empty" that it actually said "became formless and empty" indicating there happened something before Adam and Eve to make it so.
When later then Cain is cursed to wander the land, he fears being killed by OTHERS, even though he is the first born of Adam and Eve meaning there have to be other people around already.
I believe what happened was that the fallen angels (like anunaki) created humans already, the darker races.
  Looking into the hebrew translations Genesis 1 speaks of "Elohim", the angels, creating the world and "Adam", creating "Man". This is much like the pagan myths where the gods (for the angels are the pagan gods as we went through in the beginning).
Genesis 2 then goes into how YHWH Elohim, the specific one, God most high, created "Ha-Adam", THE Man.
I usually took it as Genesis 1 being just general creation with humans being mentioned in passing where Genesis 2 goes into the story of man in more detail though, but this interpretation fits really well otherwise.
Either way, from this we can say that both, heaven and earth, ultimately were created by God through the angels.
Then God eventually came along and made people in his image which came to be the line of Noah, Shem, later Abraham, the Israelites which actually are the whites(Will get to that). Thus the mark put on Cain turned his skin dark (will get to Cain being the first Nigger too) to make him appear more like those that are around already.
The Bible merely focuses on this bloodline and thus leaves out stuff happening before it, not saying there never was anything before.
Then eventually the flood happened due to all the degeneracy.

There were likely a bunch of cycles we went through believing the old tales. The bible alone implies a time before Adam and Eve, then the time from adam and eve to the flood, and then from the flood to today even though im not sure if the flood really counts as a beginning of a new cycle or merely got the ongoing one on track. i like to think there will be 5 cycles total, like how in alchemi the world is made up off the 4 elements plus spirit, each cycle working through one of those points which if the aztecs are right about the 5 suns means we are in the last one right now
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Five_Suns 
-Nahui-Ocelotl (Jaguar Sun) - Inhabitants were giants who were devoured by jaguars. The world was destroyed.
-Nahui-Ehécatl (Wind Sun) - Inhabitants were transformed into monkeys. This world was destroyed by hurricanes.
-Nahui-Quiahuitl (Rain Sun) - Inhabitants were destroyed by rain of fire. Only birds survived (or inhabitants survived by becoming birds).
-Nahui-Atl (Water Sun) - This world was flooded turning the inhabitants into fish. A couple escaped but were transformed into dogs.
-Nahui-Ollin (Earthquake Sun) - We are the inhabitants of this world. This world will be destroyed by earthquakes (or one large earthquake).
Note here is the last cataclysm that happened through water, like the flood and the other 4 elements, water, fire, earth and wind also brought destruction. the Jaguar sun may be the spirit as that was the only case something was destroyed by something alive, something with a spirit. however personally i believe the spirit is what we are working through right now, but well.

However, assuming the biblical timeline is accurate, the flood wasnt the cataclysm 12,5k years ago structures across the world seem to hint at (Göbekli tepe, pyramids, sphinx, angkor wat)seem to hint at as it would be roughly 3k years ago. However the cataclysm before the flood was a rain of fire which fits the comet narrative quite perfectly I mentioned in my Ancient History post.


https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP79B00752A000300070001-8.pdf
The Adam and Eve story by Chan Thomas. Didnt read it myself yet, but appearently it speaks of a reoccuring catastrophy destroying civilizations. Supposedly it was classified by th CIA and then a bit cleaned up and declassified.
It puts the time interval between the events to 6-7k years which kind of fits what I came to believe.

The Cataclysm 12,5k years ago I believe was the rain of fire like the aztecs call it aka an astoroid or comet hitting the earth like Göbekli Tepe tells too. The last Cataclysm I trust the bible saying it was around 3k BC, well actually around 2,4k BC, but there is the issue that kikes deleted 600 years out of the life from Shems descendents to pilpull around and claim that Jesus cant possibly be high priest
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VI1yRTC6kGE
(ignore the part about the pyramids, on that point the video is actually lacking some stuff, but it explains how all translations come from a faulty scripture.) pushing back the flood 600 years which happens to be at the time couple of cultures around the world seemingly independently created civilizations +- a couple hundred years
https://www.ancienthistorylists.com/ancient-civilizations/10-oldest-ancient-civilizations-ever-existed/
I believe they are merely the remnants of what survived

They also found something they believe to be the arc which is dated at around the same time (4800 Years)
https://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/04/100428-noahs-ark-found-in-turkey-science-religion-culture/

However if the time frames inbetween are always the same it would mean the gap between cataclysm would be around 7 thousand years like that book of Thomas says too taking the time inbetween the last 2 as reference

Another issue on the Nephillim:
There are some newsarticles of old giants being found like


Some pics of skeletons which may or may not be shopped, but the legends of giants are existent everywhere. They appearently had 6 fingers (which is possibly where the base 12 mathematics comes from which some ancient cultures appearently used).
There is an effect called Hybrid Vigor or Heterosis
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heterosis
Basically when you mix two species the hybrid offspring potentially expresses certain traits stronger than both of the parents. think of the Liger for example which is the biggest feline we know off. Or the nephilim, hybrids between (fallen) angels and humans which are the giants

According to myths they mostly had red hair which gave me another theory. In the Book of Enoch it is described how Noah is born completely white and radiating, like an albino plus emmitance of light. It is also said that thats how the angels appear. Now if an albino like angel happens to mate with a normal pigmented human like the bible says giants/nephilim were created the result could be a ginger giant.

Lincoln appearently also believed in giants. From his works
https://www.metabunk.org/context-the-eyes-of-that-species-of-extinct-giants-abraham-lincoln.t4400/ 
The eyes of that species of extinct giants, whose bones fill the mounds of America, have gazed on Niagara, as ours do now


 Earlier I talked about how the modern jews are not descendents of Judah nor Israel, so you maybe wondered "Who are the Israelites then?". As I mentioned earlier all who believe are chosen, however when we are speaking about the ethnic lineage of the people in the Bible, the descendents of Jacob/Israel, then the white race are the actual Israelites. This gets clear already when you see that Mount Aratat, where Noah landed with his arc is the same place where the white people, caucasusoids, come frome from, the Caucasus
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caucasus
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ararat
It is also known that the blue eyed people all have a common anchestor
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/01/080130170343.htm
Which most likely was Adam or Noah if the timeframe is off

Furthermore the blue eyed white people are known across the world to come around and bring technology and knowledge and rule them for some time like the seed of promise is prophesized to do.
The sumerians believed the blue eyed white people where gods, the annunaki (even though i came to believe that the blue eyed possibly are other people during the sumerians, they at least have the blue eyed people and swastika as well).
The Aztecs as well, and describe them from coming over the sea with a ship that moved on its own.
The chinese talk about blue eyed and blonde haired people who created a civilization and ruled for some time. A lot of egyptians mummies are shown to have had blonde hair etc.
And Europeans were the first in the Americas as well
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/9110838/Stone-age-Europeans-were-the-first-to-set-foot-on-North-America.html

Hitlers Ahnenerbe tried to find out about the origins of the white people, and maybe he did find out the actual israelis are the whites with the jews being the blue eyed people, who are said that they will spread across the earth and rule everywhere. Same they did during colonisations. Hitler found out the (((jews))) of today arent the jews of the bible who are just "those who belong to the synagogue of Satan, who claim to be Jews but are liars instead."

The "white privilege" people go on about, is actually the blessing of God
Joseph, in the bible, was sold off as slave to egypt, where he became friends with the pharao and married his daughter. He was given authority over everything. Compare that with the Yuya-mummie which was blond by the way.
https://web.archive.org/web/20170319164635/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yuya
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_(Genesis)

Hitlers "Herrenrasse" probably was meant to mean "Rasse des Herrn" "Race of the Lord"
The 1000 year Reich was meant to be the 1000 year Sabbath, the 7th day which never happened because Satan interrupted it and which is for God like a thousand years.
This is why the Nazis had a sense of superiority like the Israelis had for the goyim.
The (((Jew))), like everything, stole their identity from others. Just like they took german names, have plastic surgery to look more white, act white when it suits them they stole their whole identity of being a jew from the whites

From the Bible 
20 King Arius of the Spartans.To the high priest Onias. Greetings! 
21 It has been discovered in a written record that the Spartans and the Jews are relatives and are both of the family of Abraham. 22 Since we have learned this, please let us know how you are. 23 On our part, we write to let you know that what is yours—your livestock and property—belongs to us, and ours belongs to you. We therefore command that our envoys report to you in keeping with this.

Also
https://truthvids.net/
mentions a lot of descriptions of what the Israelites are and will be doing, and how it all fits the Europeans
 Note that hebrew like we know it exist like this like the middle of the 19th century.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hebrew_language 
Archaic Biblical Hebrew from the 10th to the 6th century BCE, corresponding to the Monarchic Period until the Babylonian Exile and represented by certain texts in the Hebrew Bible (Tanakh), notably the Song of Moses (Exodus 15) and the Song of Deborah (Judges 5). Also called Old Hebrew or Paleo-Hebrew. It was written in the Paleo-Hebrew alphabet. A script descended from this, the Samaritan alphabet, is still used by the Samaritans.

Originally the bible was written in Paleo-Hebrew.

Left is Paleo Hebrew and on the right the Vinca Runes found across europe, mainly central and southeast giving a further connection between those
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paleo-Hebrew_alphabet
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vin%C4%8Da_symbols
given a further connection that the real isralites and chosen people are the aryans

http://piramidasunca.ba/bs/latest-news/item/3495-the-oldest-writing-in-the-world-has-been-decoded.html 
(1) O Three-One God of the land of Thrace,
(2) I vow in Truth to bring you all due offerings, O great Son of God, 
(3) And only you (shall) I praise (and exalt), O my God (for you are) great! 
(4) You who are now in your temple, (I pray, hear me), keep me safe and deliver me (from all evil)!
Three one god, the trinity being a theme in the oldest text we have deciphered so far. The trinity is another theme which draws itself across a lot of culture, from sumer to egypt, to the Nordics and of course christianity written in the Vinca Runes, found in Bulgaria (Balkans)

https://www.behindthename.com/name/adam 
This is the Hebrew word for "man". It could be ultimately derived from Hebrew אדם ('adam) meaning "to be red", referring to the ruddy colour of human skin

red, like whites are right after birth or when too long in the sun


A picture commanded to be made of Jesus by Tiberius Ceasar. Appearently a recreation, but still in the Library of Congress so probably accurate
http://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/90707066/
red, like whites are right after birth or when too long in the sun

Esau, the twin brother of Jacob, who birthed the Israelites is described as 
25The first one came out red, covered with hair like a fur coat; so they named him Esau
red hair, a trait usually found in whites mostly. If Esau was white his twinbrother was too.

7Her dignitaries were brighter than snow, whiter than milk; their bodies were more ruddy than rubies, their appearance like sapphires. 8But now their appearance is blacker than soot; they are not recognized in the streets. Their skin has shriveled on their bones; it has become as dry as a stick
So first they were white, then something happened, likely the captivity where they were brought away, and were replaced by dark people.


https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1003316 
We reconstructed the genetic structure of the Levantines and found that a pre-Islamic expansion Levant was more genetically similar to Europeans than to Middle Easterners


https://penelope.uchicago.edu/josephus/ant-12.html 
And when he had given them [Jews/Descendents of the high priesthood] leave, they also hid the circumcision of their genitals; that even when they were naked they might appear to be Greeks. Accordingly they left off all the customs that belonged to their own countrey, and imitated the practices of the other nations.

so the ancient Judahites/Levites (when its about the descendents of the priesthood probably) looked just like the greeks

When im correct with everything regarding the lineages it means that the that the blacks claiming relation to egypt arent actually wrong, but are leaving out a lot
The pyramids and all that stuff was build by those before the flood, the real ancient egyptians. Then came the flood and wiped them away leaving only the monuments. After that the son of ham (traditionaly regarded as the progenitor of the blacks after the flood), Myzriam went to that area and settled there according to the bible and LARPed as civilization.
Couple hundred years later Joseph (white) gets sold by his brothers into slavery to egypt. When he arrived there he saw the people starving (curse of cain doesnt let the ground yield fruit for them which is why niggers never learnt farming in all the time).
Joseph then teaches them the basics and enables them to sustain their people again. For this he got appointed as the closest associate of the pharao and was given complete authority and egypt converted to monotheism.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aten
Who later became a monotheistic God. Coincidently
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atenism 
In the 14th century BC, Atenism was Egypt's state religion for around 20 years

this fits perfectly the time of Yuya mummy
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yuya 
Yuya was a powerful Egyptian courtier during the Eighteenth dynasty of Egypt (circa 1390 BC)

Which is also the time Joseph is said to have lived
So around the the same time blonde Yuya, who most likely was the biblical Joseph, who came around egypt and teached them to farm and sustain their people and as a result became the closest ally of the pharao, they started worshiping a single God, Aten, and Aten coincidentally is also associated with the sun again like most symbolism around the biblical God revolves

Also note that all the prophecieson Israel fit the white man way better than kikes or other ethnicities

Now some less relevant issue, but one that still shows connection between the story the Bible recorded, and that of other cultures
http://www.emergingtruths.com/lots_wife/lots_wife.html 
The Hebrew word translated as salt in this passage is melach, which does indeed mean salt. However, the root of melach is malach, which means to vanish away, or dissipate, as salt does when mixed into water. Given that Hebrew writing omits vowels, it's easy to see why malach may have been mistranslated as melach.

If this is true it means Lots wife didnt turn into salt, but simply vanished.
And where they believe Sodom to have been they found Trinite
https://www.westernseminary.edu/transformedblog/2016/01/12/the-existence-and-location-of-sodom/

This leads me to
http://www.theepochtimes.com/n3/23630-ancient-atomic-bombs/ 
Seven years after the nuclear tests in Alamogordo, New Mexico, Dr. J. Robert Oppenheimer [...] was lecturing at a college when a student asked if it was the first atomic test conducted.
“Yes, in modern times,” he replied. 
Many scientists have sought to explain the dispersion of large glass rocks in the deserts of Libya, the Sahara, Mojave, and many other places in the world, as products of gigantic meteorite impacts. However, due to the absence of accompanying craters in the desert, the theory doesn’t hold up. Neither satellite imagery nor sonar has been able to find any holes. 
Furthermore, the glass rocks found in the Libyan Desert present a grade of transparency and purity (99 percent) that is not typical in the fusions of fallen meteorites

There are also Hindu scripts talking about weapons which appear to be quite similar to nukes or powerfull bombs
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brahmastra 
The weapon was also believed to cause severe collateral damage. The land where the weapon was used became barren, and all life in and around that area ceased to exist. Both men and women became infertile. There was also a severe decrease in rainfall with the land developing cracks, as in a drought
This image, quoted from hindu scripts

Another issue people bring up in an effort to debunk the Bible are Dinosaurs, so let us look into them:
Dinosaurs, I believe, lived during the same time as humans did. And the bible does talk about them, just calls them behemoth.
And I think this is how it really was. Here some not so old mentions of dinosaurlike creatures.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mokele-mbembe
This is described to look like a longneck dinosaur, and was allegedly seen africa

There are rocks showing humans and dinosaurs together
http://www.ancient-origins.net/unexplained-phenomena/do-ica-stones-prove-mankind-coexisted-dinosaurs-advanced-technology-098989
It is claimed they are faked, but the explenation is that ONE guy faked all of the over 16 thousand of those discovered stones while also new ones are discovered all the time

Marco Polos description of dragons
http://www.forbidden-history.com/marco-polo.html 
"Leaving the city of Yachi, and traveling ten days in a westerly direction, you reach the province of Karazan, which is also the name of the chief city....Here are seen huge serpents, ten paces in length (about 30 feet), and ten spans (about 8 feet) girt of the body. At the fore part, near the head, they have two short legs, having three claws like those of a tiger, with eyes larger than a forepenny loaf (pane da quattro denari) and very glaring." 
The jaws are wide enough to swallow a man, the teeth are large and sharp, and their whole appearance is so formidable, that neither man, nor any kind of animal can approach them without terror. Others are met with of a smaller size, being eight, six, or 5 paces long; and the following method is used for taking them. In the day-time, by reason of great heat, they lurk in caverns, from whence, at night, they issue to seek their food, and whatever beast they meet with and can lay hold of, whether tiger, wolf, or any other, they devour

All signs humans were living during the same time as dinosaurs. What do you think they did when it was said some heroes slayed a dragon?
regarding fossils
https://www.livescience.com/37781-how-do-fossils-form-rocks.html 
The most common method of fossilization is called permineralization, or petrification. After an organism's soft tissues decay in sediment, the hard parts — particularly the bones — are left behind. 
Water seeps into the remains, and minerals dissolved in the water seep into the spaces within the remains, where they form crystals. These crystallized minerals cause the remains to harden along with the encasing sedimentary rock. 
In another fossilization process, called replacement, the minerals in groundwater replace the minerals that make up the bodily remains after the water completely dissolves the original hard parts of the organism.

So basically they get buried by some mud which is under water. Assuming a great flood hit them like the one in the bible or the countless other floodmyths across the world, wouldnt that meet the conditions?
11In the six hundredth year of Noah's life, in the second month, on the seventeenth day of the month, on the same day all the fountains of the great deep burst open, and the floodgates of the sky were opened.
"fountains of the great deep "
Thousands of years later there is a discovery making it possible those fountain of the great deep actually exist
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2014/jun/13/earth-may-have-underground-ocean-three-times-that-on-surface

soft dinosaur tissue discovered on dinosaur bones
This here was only recently discovered
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/magazine/2017/06/dinosaur-nodosaur-fossil-discovery/
hardly looks 65 million years old

A last bit, which only ever is necessary to know when dealing with dishonest people, are the various definitions of "Jew" at play.
So: What is a "Jew"?

The first definition that is used is: 
Those of the ethnic group the modern kikes are

Modern "Jews" are however Edomites  that were forcefully converted and created the oral law (which became the Talmud) in an effort to pilpul their way around the law as we went over in the beginning. By this definition Jesus is not a "Jew"

The next one is 
Descendent of Judah
In this case Jesus would be a Jew, but modern ones would be not.

Those of the faith of Judaism
Judaism is Talmudism which is based on the Oral Law of the Pharisee, those that were rebuked by Jesus constantly because of their heretical practices so obviously Jesus didnt follow that faith and thus wouldnt be a "Jew".

The whole of Israel
Sometimes people conflate "Jew" with the other 11 Tribes. In that case Jesus would be one but modern Kikes not

Citizen of the state Judeah
This is the only case in which both, todays "Jews" and Jesus can be considered a "Jew". This is also the definition of the word "Ioudaios" which the Bible has translated as "Jew" in the NT, as in Jesus time not only the descendents of Judah lived there but also the aforementioned Edomites which after the Babylonian Captivity essentially took over the country.




Edit: Added the definition of sin. searching for "Missing the mark" should get you to that area. (21. September 2020)

Comments

  1. Brother, I have discovered your blog, and it has been such a wondrous learning opportunity. Thank you so much for creating this separate website to store all of your research.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Really impressed by this, very informative. I'd like to know which english version of the Bible do you think people should read?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thats a difficult question.
      personally i didnt see much difference in various translation. Some just make it more prone to pilpul and such which isnt an issue if you approach it in earnest.
      I would look for a translation of the greek septuagint which I believe is less corrupted than the masoretic text most bibles are based upon.
      The KJV just uses the most bombastic language which I feel is at the cost of faithful translation, but not necessary falsifying anything.
      Personaly I like the Berean Study Bible in english

      Delete
  3. Today /pol/ has been purged of all pro Christian threads and I have been banned for apparently breaking rule 1 of /pol/. December 20 2020

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well, for a few months now im rangebanned and need to outsource the OP to make threads. So I know you pain mate

      Delete
    2. Well I quit 4chan you should check out this guy much more sane than 4chan https://www.youtube.com/user/Robertbreaker3/featured

      Delete

Post a Comment