On the NASA and their lies

I feel the need to first make a small disclaimer here. When I say that NASA is fake I don't mean we never went to space or the moon, that the Earth is flat, or any other straw men usually directly claimed to imply by the statement that "NASA is fake".
What I do mean is exactly that, NASA provides us, at least partly, with fake material. The possible motives are many and change depending on the instance. I also believe that other spaceagencies arent any better themselves, I merely focus on NASA because I have the most material on this one

What could be the reasons? They could cover up a military space program we aren't supposed to know. It all could be a tax scam. They say that NASA gets $20 billion for example, while in reality they just get a couple million to produce fakes and some coke and hookers with the remaining billions being channelled into black  projects like the mentioned military space program or whatever the CIA currently needs money for. They could cover up the entrances at the poles to the hollow earth, hiding a continent somewhere the elite uses as their own paradise, and a whole bunch of more stuff I probably am not creative enough to think of.

In case of the Moon landing they could have went there and still present fakes. For example maybe they feared that the mission failed and thus produced fake footage to sell it off as a success no matter what. The Van Allen Radiation belt may would have erased every footage they transported through it, and without pictures and videos its just no good propaganda, even if successful. Maybe they found something on the Moon we aren't supposed to see. I simply have no idea. All I know is that a lot of the stuff NASA presents is fake.

https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP85-00821R000100110007-7.pdf
On page 7 this one states that NASA underlies the military space program and have to follow its orders. Did you ever hear of the military space program ever? That it did anything at all? Maybe because it was successfully covered up as a normal NASA operation?

Next point, why weren't these ones looked closer at:
https://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl-raw-images/msss/00184/mcam/0184MR0925102000E1_DXXX.jpg

This second one is with some adjusted brightness and contrast

Now this might be completely unrelated, however this seemingly head of a statue looks pretty similar to the face on this dude, which may means nothing, may means that the pictures are actually from earth, or that we have martian roots. Decide the meaning yourself. Nevertheless I would personally take a closer look on that "rock"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coatlicue

What is it that could possibly fly around on Mars? A UFO? Some animal?
https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP85-00821R000100110007-7.pdf

This, in shape, resembles the UFO on the footage released by the Chilean Navy recently, saying they have no idea what it is

 Here we have a rock that looks awfully a lot like a Rodent.
  https://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/jpeg/PIA16204.jpg

 Now this is probably the most vague one, but it looks like a spider/crab clinging to the rock
 https://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl-raw-images/msss/00710/mcam/0710MR0030150070402501E01_DXXX.jpg

 And again with adjusted brightness and contrast.

 What is this thing seen here? Some kind of Ram?
https://mars.nasa.gov/mer/gallery/all/1/p/3954/1P479207643ESFCM29P2377L5M1.JPG

 So what does this mean? It either means there is life on Mars, the pictures are made on Earth, or I'm imagining things. I believe they are made on earth. The following pic for example shows how easy it is to convert earth landscape into Mars. The left pic is the original, and apparently just by altering the colour sheme a bit we get Mars

So how big is North America Really?

Now this could happen by taking pictures at different distances and it could be since being at a lower altitude makes less of the Earth visible and thus make something appear bigger in relation to the Earth, but:

Picture 2 (Blue marble 2002) has been done from 700km height
https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/BlueMarble/BlueMarble_2002.php
>Flying over 700 km above the Earth onboard the Terra satellite

the 4th picture (Blue Marble 2012) was made with the NPP/Suomi NPP sattalite orbiting at 824km
https://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/imagegallery/image_feature_2159.html
>A 'Blue Marble' image of the Earth taken from the VIIRS instrument aboard NASA's most recently launched Earth-observing satellite - Suomi NPP.
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suomi_NPP
>The satellite was placed into a sun-synchronous orbit 824 km (512 miles) above the Earth.

So when the distance is the issue of the size difference the sizes should be reversed and I doubt it would create such a big difference since the difference in height is one ~1/7th of the distance, and yet America appears twice as big in the one that is even from further away.

The pic allegedly gets created by taking a lot of smaller pics and stitching them together, but still that would mean that they do a fucking poor job in creating an accurate depiction of our planet when there are such big differences




Apparently NASA gets really mad when trying to sell a moon rock
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2052819/NASA-raids-Dennys-Joann-Davis-74-tries-sell-Neil-Armstrong-moon-dust.html
This article even stated they let the old lady pee herself and sit in the pee for quite some time just because of some moon"rock"

However considering this about the moon rocks
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/space/6105902/Moon-rock-given-to-Holland-by-Neil-Armstrong-and-Buzz-Aldrin-is-fake.html
It may explain why they are so furious about it. They don't want people to find out they are not Moon rocks at all.

Furthermore it seems like they don't want people to look at the original tapes, or do you believe they really would accidentally erase something like that?
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2009/jul/16/moon-landing-tapes-erased

And the astronauts dont seem like people that are mentally stable enough to be send into space
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o1S0oObHT0c



 On these 2 pics you see that there apparently was no dust blown up during the landing. Not a tiny bit of dust landed on the foot, and no signs of dust being blown away underneath the capsule either.

 Now I saw people claiming due to the lack of atmosphere there wouldn't be any dust getting blown up either way, but then what about this footage of the landing?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a2As10bFzsw

 I want you to pay attention on the capsule here. No acceleration, no deceleration, just steadily gliding out of frame, apparently from the small push in the beginning. If that bit of momentum is enough to leave the moon, wouldn't the Astronauts be at danger of accidentally jumping of the moon? It furthermore looks like the capsule is swinging slightly left and right as if pulled up by a string.

 There is also the small fact that "nasha" (Or "nasa" with some extra sign on the "s")
means "to deceive" in Hebrew
https://www.blueletterbible.org/lang/lexicon/lexicon.cfm?Strongs=H5377&t=KJV

 I honestly have no idea about the origin of this picture, but it looks like its supposed to be in space, but the reflection says its obviously not.

 Why is the object in the photograph covering the crosshair?

And now I think I only have some pictures left that speak for themselves.


 https://spaceflight.nasa.gov/gallery/images/apollo/apollo14/hires/as14-68-9487.jpg